Bangor Studio/Membership Department
63 Texas Ave.
Bangor, ME 04401

Lewiston Studio
1450 Lisbon St.
Lewiston, ME 04240

Portland Studio
323 Marginal Way
Portland, ME 04101

Registered 501(c)(3) EIN: 22-3171529
© 2025 Maine Public
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations
Scroll down to see all available streams.

Maine Supreme Court looks to change judicial disciplinary proceedings for justices

In this Thursday, April 12, 2018, photo, Justice Andrew M. Mead, third from right, asks a question during a hearing in the Maine Supreme Judicial Court on whether ranked-choice voting can be used in Maine's June 12th primary, in Portland, Maine.
Robert F. Bukaty
/
AP
FILE photo- In this Thursday, April 12, 2018, photo, justices sit during a hearing in the Maine Supreme Judicial Court in Portland, Maine.

The state Supreme Court has proposed new rules for discipline proceedings for judges, but its not clear when the rules could go into effect and if they will impact Supreme Court Justice Catherine Connors discipline case.

Currently, there are no specific rules for complaints against a Maine Supreme Court justice. All complaints are investigated by the Committee on Judicial Conduct, which can make a recommendation for discipline. The Supreme Court then makes a final decision.

The proposed rules would instead create a panel of four Superior Court justices and Four District court judges to make a final decision on matters involving a Supreme Court justice.

Dmitry Bam, a professor of law at the University of Maine School of Law, said the proposal isn't perfect, but a step in the right direction.

"I think it creates potential perception or appearance of bias issues when you're evaluating your own colleagues," he said. "So I do think having a neutral party is an important step."

But Bob Cummins, a veteran Maine attorney who helped create the American Bar Association model rules for judicial disciplinary enforcement, said it would be best if attorneys and public representatives were on the panel as well.

"Judges judging judges is always a matter of some concern to the public, at least on occasion," he said.

The proposal comes after the Committee on Judicial Conduct recommended Maine Supreme Court Justice Catherine Connors be publicly reprimanded for not recusing herself from two recent foreclosure cases.

But there is not a defined timeline for next steps in Connors case or for when the court could finalize the new rules.

An advisory note on the proposal says the change is "necessary to prevent the appearance of impropriety." Once adopted, the new rules would go into effect immediately and apply to pending matters, including the Connors case.

Kaitlyn Budion is Maine Public’s Bangor correspondent, joining the reporting team after several years working in print journalism.